Fujitsu AMILO Li3710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu AMILO Li3710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU EF7
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 900
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 29
2-Core 19.7
29% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 23.7
8-Core 29.7
4% 26.7 Pts
64-Core 27.6
2% 27.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1160)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280-120GB 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0901A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 114 42 51 43 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 234
Write 211
Mixed 125
SusWrite 81.3
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 19.8
58% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 61.6
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 51.3
38% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AMILO Li3710 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu AMILO Li3710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback