PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B54h |
Memory | 20.7 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 4.9 Days |
Run Date | Nov 15 '21 at 19:08 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
67.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 190 193 189 190 190 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0110
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 66GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 298x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 274x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 255x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 145x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 124x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 99x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 53x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |