HP HPE-532sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP HPE-532sc  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '17 at 18:49
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 358
47% 355 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Device(1B0A 9083) 2GB
CLim: 852 MHz, MLim: 485 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.83
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 2.25
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 2.91
2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 106
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.19
48% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
660GB free
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 88.3
Mixed 88
68% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.54
118% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-532sc Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-532sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback