Besstar X400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemBesstar X400  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR Default string
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 11:30
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 719
77% 614 Pts
64-Core 719
44% 719 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 19
Parallax 23.3
14% 19.9 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 19.4
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 288 291 294 296 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,349
Write 1,123
Mixed 1,115
SusWrite 294
217% 970 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 70.4
246% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 816
631% 857 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 187%
Great: 222%
Sabrent ASM1351 250GB
57GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 135 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 346
Write 108
Mixed 200
SusWrite 96.2
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.2
42% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S1ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 27.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X400 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Besstar X400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback