HP ProDesk 400 G4 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G4 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A1
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171106
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 11:25
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 186
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 323
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 82A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 7.7
0% 3.47 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 79 79 45 73 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 113
Write 63.9
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 70.2
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 103%
Philips DPM4-Harddisk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 4
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.8
7% 5.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
74% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 9.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G4 MT Builds (Compare 890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G4 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback