HP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF IDS APJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF IDS APJ  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83F2
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 05:04
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 467
62% 466 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
HP(103C 83F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6136
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
762GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 50 43 47 44 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 135
Write 141
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 57.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G5 SFF IDS APJ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF IDS APJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback