Fujitsu AMILO PRO V3515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu AMILO PRO V3515  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU AMILO PRO V3515
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 23:35
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2300
mPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Memory 44.1
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 31.6
22% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 31.8
8-Core 32.1
4% 31.9 Pts
64-Core 32.4
2% 32.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM 1.1
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10CB) 256MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX32.dll Ver. 8.14.14.81
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0
Reflection 0.2
0% 0.1 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600BJKT-75F4T0 160GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 80 77 60 65 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 79.2
Write 79.3
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 67
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 1.2
6% 2.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.5
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback