Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 112
55% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 200
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 48.4
45% 53.4 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 45.9
38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba- TR200 240GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 112 24 87 32 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 382
Write 332
Mixed 118
SusWrite 89.7
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 14.9
38% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 69.7
44% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
164GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 93 98 96 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 174
Write 133
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 94.7
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
32GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 65 59 60 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 56
Write 57.7
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 68.6
40% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A85XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $126
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback