Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 108% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 160 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 464 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	196% Outstanding	Lighting 275 Reflection 287 Parallax 334 224% 298 fps	MRender 358 Gravity 261 Splatting 188 211% 269 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 225%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT02L5Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 160 158 179 192 197 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 381 Write 170 Mixed 128 SusWrite 167 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 18.9 73% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 59.9 83% 160 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Dark-1600 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAB 04EF Dark-1600 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAB 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	41x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	34x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $624

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16