Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 15:18
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 871
89% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.56
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 55.7
48% 59.4 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 50.6
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.05
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 20.3
12% 33.3 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 17
12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 386 386 384 383 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,325
Write 2,202
Mixed 1,508
SusWrite 543
367% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 77.4
257% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 982
737% 980 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 250%
Great: 264%
WDC WD10SPSX-08A6W 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 239
Mixed 96.1
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 1
9% 4.47 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 18%
Toshiba MK2565GSX HR 160GB
16GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 25.6
Write 28.6
Mixed 25
SusWrite 63.2
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 36%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
4GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.5
Write 93.4
Mixed 85.9
107% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
139% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback