Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 14:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 538
55% 443 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Detech DT-SSD480GB 480GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0909A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 88 14 78 11 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
Read 491
Write 409
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 102
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 0.6
65% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 0.8
64% 148 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Adata Adata 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 32
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 27.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback