Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory38GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 38GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory35.2 GB free of 38 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 13:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 155
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 519
48% 404 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 340.84
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 19.9
17% 19.4 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 16
16% 20 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 478GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 180 139 309 9.3 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 369
Write 356
Mixed 312
SusWrite 164
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 18.5
61% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 91
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 21.6
36% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
29GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 43.1
Mixed 53
SusWrite 92.8
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
48GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 72.4
Write 38.9
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 96.9
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 38GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback