Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 675
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 145
Parallax 148
109% 143 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 136
Splatting 124
101% 122 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 374 402 443 429 329 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 478
Mixed 375
SusWrite 405
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 47.2
151% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
205GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 101 105 108 103 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,452
Write 1,525
Mixed 1,047
SusWrite 236
238% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 60
191% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 592
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 273
269% 433 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 155%
Great: 255%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
367GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 894 894 892 893 891 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 925
Mixed 872
SusWrite 893
229% 1,026 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 59.6
199% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 344
272% 375 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 190%
Great: 209%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
651GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 70 67 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 37.4
Write 1.7
Mixed 56
SusWrite 68.8
31% 41 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
260% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
577GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 97 98 100 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 96.7
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown YXS1866C10D3/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 43
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback