Acer Aspire A314-22

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A314-22  (all builds)
MotherboardDL Tulip_DA
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 10:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 37.3
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 121
42% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 98.2
8-Core 104
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 96.9
6% 96.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 1458) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.11.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.07 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1014 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 243 211 210 216 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 503
Write 451
Mixed 455
SusWrite 219
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 45.4
138% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 206
167% 240 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 155%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S1ME-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A314-22 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A314-22

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback