Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_K712JA

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_K712JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X712JA
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210524
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '21 at 09:51
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	42%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 60.8 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 119 48% 81.7 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 286 32% 250 Pts	64-Core 277 17% 277 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1502) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 8.5 Parallax 11.3 6% 9.07 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 11.6 8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 560 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 389GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 907 909 906 924 926 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 844 Write 926 Mixed 773 SusWrite 909 195% 863 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 45.1 148% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 398 280% 351 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 192%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2667, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 21.6 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_K712JA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_K712JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	6x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	3x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	6x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	3x

SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDB 256GBNvmeBench 130%, 1,492 samples	2x
KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBNvmeBench 137%, 560 samples	2x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE 029E CMSO4GX4M1A2133C15 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 2 samples	2x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GBMicronBench 59%, 25 samples	2x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 26,749 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16