Acer VAG70_HC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer VAG70_HC  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 VAG70
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 06:01
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 63
2-Core 94.5
50% 77 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 160
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD230S 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 33 14 8.9 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 405
Write 120
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 43.2
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 12.8
53% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 167
124% 162 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
81GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 54
Write 48.9
Mixed 32
SusWrite 61.3
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
111GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 61
Mixed 39.9
38% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VAG70_HC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer VAG70_HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback