Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	84.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '21 at 04:48
Run Duration	368 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 76.4 1-Core 141 2-Core 269 88% 162 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 778 80% 646 Pts	64-Core 974 60% 974 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3734) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 124 Parallax 141 114% 135 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 134 Splatting 111 112% 142 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB 11,656 User benchmarks, average bench 246% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 505 506 496 485 456 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1,923 Write 1,607 Mixed 1691 SusWrite 564 324% 1,446 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 69.6 248% 94 MB/s	DQ Read 1,184 DQ Write 816 DQ Mixed 1,000 746% 1000 MB/s
Poor: 184% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 288%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 233GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 440 423 296 295 296 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 441 Mixed 435 SusWrite 361 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 57.1 187% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 128%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 347GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 420 425 426 426 419 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 393 Mixed 408 SusWrite 418 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 50.7 164% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 186 144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 123%
Team T253X2001T 1TB 11,283 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 72 3.2 67 60 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 105%
Team T253X2001T 1TB 11,283 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 73 3.2 68 61 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 105%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 185 201 194 209 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 118 Write 152 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 196 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 197% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 68%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 9TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 200 202 200 200 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 199 Mixed 140 SusWrite 200 250% 184 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 0.8 356% 4.53 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 5.5 DQ Mixed 1.3 234% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN CL16-18-18 D4-3200 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 95GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 36.4 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 35.5 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,652x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,264x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $129Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,415x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,238x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,077x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,470x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	725x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16