Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 145 60% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 349 38% 299 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0505) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.09% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.8 Parallax 1.8 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.09% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 255GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 312 315 311 316 317 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 454 Write 419 Mixed 409 SusWrite 324 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 29.9 96% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 361 270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	437x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	133x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	73x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	49x
A400 480GBKingston $34Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	18x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	37x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	33x
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 1,571 samples	27x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253