Acer Aspire 5742G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5742G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5742G
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '17 at 07:44
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 124
49% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 170
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420M
Acer(1025 0487) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 285.90
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 3.58
Parallax 1.03
2% 2.52 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.22
2% 3.05 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 63.4
Mixed 59.5
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.32
75% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ACR256X64D3S1333C9 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5742G Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5742G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback