Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '17 at 05:31
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 121
58% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 372
36% 297 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1080 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 78.5
Write 70.9
Mixed 22.9
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.27
76% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
392GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 168
Mixed 108
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 5.66
4K Mixed 0.65
207% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 160GB-$34
392GB free
Firmware: GMBOA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 175
Mixed 117
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.81
4K Mixed 0.72
221% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 101%
Great: 41%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 160GB-$34
392GB free
Firmware: GMBOA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 175
Mixed 146
124% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 5.81
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 101%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-8GBNT Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback