Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 09:37
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6098P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 114
2-Core 198
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 321
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 29.5
27% 34.8 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 36.2
Splatting 25.1
26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37240G 240GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 239 65 65 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 428
Write 273
Mixed 299
SusWrite 134
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 23.1
109% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 172
153% 227 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 165 168 166 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 164
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
682GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 183 179 181 182 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 137
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 181
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
SRT USB 32GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 16 18 18 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 18.1
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
116% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M1A2400C16 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.1% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2PH-CF Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback