Lenovo 90AV000TFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90AV000TFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 09:06
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 336
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Nvidia(10DE 086A) 1.5GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 47.5
Parallax 30.9
21% 34.8 fps
MRender 43
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 29.4
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 405 389 393 397 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 433
Write 344
Mixed 332
SusWrite 395
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 25.9
118% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 34.8
74% 150 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AV000TFR Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90AV000TFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback