| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Biostar H310MHP (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191113 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 13 '21 at 06:11 |
| Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.9%
Very good
|
74% 127 Pts
|
63% 514 Pts
|
39% 634 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.4%
Poor
|
30% 39.6 fps
|
18% 25.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$33
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 25 30 35 27 25 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
14% 63.1 MB/s
|
136% 48.5 MB/s
|
43% 96.4 MB/s
|
|
WDC WD50 00AAKX-60U6AA0 500GB
302GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 38 38 40 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
46% 34.2 MB/s
|
87% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
72.7%
Very good
|
74% 25.9 GB/s
|
61% 21.5 GB/s
|
55% 72.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,024 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 358x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 287x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 45x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 134x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 94x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 54x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $318 |