Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 23:34
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 57.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 208
66% 122 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 823
74% 622 Pts
64-Core 815
50% 815 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 118
Parallax 15.2
90% 81.3 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 109
Splatting 106
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8000NP 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C2.2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 114 109 101 162 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 555
Write 125
Mixed 180
SusWrite 146
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 35.6
132% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 128
102% 144 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 137%
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
9GB free
Firmware: 609ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 110 90 100 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.1% Above average
Read 223
Write 115
Mixed 149
SusWrite 102
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 27.8
114% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 71.2
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 92.2
72% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
201GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 155 157 126 151 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 150
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 148
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
601GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 165 166 132 159 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 133
Write 147
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 161
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 106%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4.5
Mixed 0.2
2% 2.35 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.4 4.3 3.9 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.3
8% 7.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/16G KHX2400C15D4/8G 32GB
2803, 2803, 2803 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 21
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 6.5
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback