Asus CM1740-8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus CM1740-8  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1740-8
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120913
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 19:48
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 40.8
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 76.1
31% 51.8 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 144
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 2.9
2% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 196 269 198 298 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
657GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 160 135 170 161 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 112
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 160
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC SLZ302G08-GGNHC 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1740-8 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1740-8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback