Oegstone DH61CR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemOegstone DH61CR  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH61CR
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 10:32
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 378
47% 357 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Asus(1043 835C) 768MB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 920 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 13.7
12% 15.6 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 13.2
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IND-S325S/128G 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 95 85 117 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 192
Write 117
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 80.1
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 2.5
33% 8.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
659GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 100 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 101
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH61CR Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Oegstone DH61CR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback