Asus H170M-PLUS/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS/BR  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 02:28
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 85.7
43% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 215
21% 174 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 64.5
49% 65 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 65
53% 65 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 73 8.6 52 46 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 324
Write 168
Mixed 232
SusWrite 32.5
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 14.1
54% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 12.3
47% 105 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 Patriot 2400 C15 Series 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS/BR Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback