Monster ABRA A5 V16.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.5
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 00:05
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 700
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8478
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 20.1 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 6
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 750 417 381 371 334 314 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,660
Write 1,616
Mixed 1,432
SusWrite 428
288% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 59.4
209% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 807
614% 831 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 194%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 12.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.5 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback