Compaq-presario BM411AA-ABA CQ5600F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCompaq-presario BM411AA-ABA CQ5600F  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON NARRA5
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 19:11
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 68.4
38% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 134
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
EVGA(3842 2643) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9.3
6% 8.4 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8.6
7% 9.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 101 116 114 113 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 184
Write 147
Mixed 142
SusWrite 106
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 29.1
98% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 37.7
37% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 73%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
5GB free
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 194
Write 136
Mixed 151
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 26.5
92% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 36.1
37% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
732GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 172 171 170 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 144
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 171
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM411AA-ABA CQ5600F Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario BM411AA-ABA CQ5600F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback