Monster TULPAR T5 V21.7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V21.7  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V21.7
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 176
2-Core 310
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 730
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1147) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 22.9
4% 17.1 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 43.4
28% 32.8 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1926 1914 1953 1137 811 807 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 1723
Write 1,838
Mixed 1760
SusWrite 1,425
380% 1,686 MB/s
4K Read 81.1
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 107
364% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1166
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 919
702% 960 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 313%
Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 33.9
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 18.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V21.7 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V21.7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback