Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409DA
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 16:40
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
66% 122 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 425
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1B21) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13.5
7% 11.1 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 109 104 124 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 826
Write 57.4
Mixed 201
SusWrite 118
64% 300 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 6.9
40% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 181
130% 170 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 12
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_P1410CDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback