HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85FE
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 12.1
2-Core 26.8
24% 31 Pts
4-Core 37.5
8-Core 107
8% 72.3 Pts
64-Core 97.9
6% 97.9 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 85FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 23
Parallax 4.4
3% 10.3 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GB
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10112006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 499 392 500 521 481 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 475
Write 726
Mixed 449
SusWrite 478
120% 532 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 14.6
47% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 119
81% 99 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 267%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
425GB free
Firmware: RPM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 91 104 98 101 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 148
Mixed 63
SusWrite 98.9
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4S7S8MBP-8 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 14.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx Builds (Compare 1,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback