Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 09:29
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 52.3
2-Core 125
44% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 177
26% 188 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
PwrHis(1787 201C) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 22.8
12% 18.7 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 12.3
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
165GB free
Firmware: UG4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 176 170 186 179 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 293
Write 262
Mixed 132
SusWrite 193
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 14.8
45% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 17.4
13% 18 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 43 50 72 86 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 47.2
Write 27.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 70.7
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 70%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
28GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 7.1 19 19 14 6.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 10.4
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 11.9
16% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-HD+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback