Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409JB
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 07:56
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 95
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 259
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
Asus(1043 180F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 8.8
6% 8.93 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.8
5% 5.23 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 151 113 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 424
Write 345
Mixed 356
SusWrite 152
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 41.1
144% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 247
184% 243 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
796GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 122 125 126 127 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 84.1
Write 100
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 122
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 0B79 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 22.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback