ECS A880GM-AD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardECS A880GM-AD3  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 02:45
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 47
2-Core 94.4
49% 75 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 185
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3530) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.6 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 21 15 17 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 33
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 21
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 14GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A880GM-AD3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A880GM-AD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback