HP 870-245qe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 870-245qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830C
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 01:08
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 514
69% 514 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 65
Parallax 58.8
51% 62.1 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 59.9
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 76 76 73 79 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 167
Write 164
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 73.5
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 36.7
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 39.2
25% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
169% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 4GB
4GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
7.82% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 14
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 4.4
15% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
87% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.82%
Great: 12%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 104 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 113
Write 94
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 104
128% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.8
274% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 Hynix ATECH16GPC42400U 24GB
2400, 2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-245qe Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: HP 870-245qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback