TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 85.5
52% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 397
37% 310 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 49.5%
 Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 12
Parallax 16.2
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 10.7
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 9.14%
 Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
649GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 79 85 77 98 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 30
Write 81.1
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 84.8
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 33.1%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC Kingston 9905700-015.A00G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 48.3%
 Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples201x
Ryzen 3 2200UAMDBench 45%, 15,631 samples22x
Ryzen 7 2700UAMDBench 52%, 8,291 samples5x
GPU
Radeon Vega 8 Mobile GraphicsAMDBench 8%, 8,935 samples167x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples34x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples22x
SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples23x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples14x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples14x
RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 2,704 samples67x
M471A5143EB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,996 samples26x
M471A5143EB1-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 59%, 311 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback