Panasonic FZG1-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic FZG1-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZG1-3
Memory5 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 04:53
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 134
58% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 183
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 4.7
2% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Picopc MS-256GB SSD 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 334 352 326 329 327 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.4% Good
Read 383
Write 334
Mixed 315
SusWrite 334
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 13.4
72% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 38.3
79% 154 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FZG1-3 5HTSA89495 0032 FZG1-3 5HTSA89495 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FZG1-3 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZG1-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback