HP 700-320ns

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-320ns  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory16 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 03:31
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 201
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 597
57% 472 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.7% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 107
Parallax 110
92% 110 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 98
Splatting 89.9
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 59 4.4 3.2 10 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 458
Write 408
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 79.6
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1
48% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 6.8
DQ Mixed 41.1
32% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
39GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 183 75 58 82 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 494
Write 421
Mixed 406
SusWrite 143
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 1.2
54% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 1.2
64% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
649GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 141 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 133
Write 129
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 142
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0215 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0215 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-320ns Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: HP 700-320ns

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $436
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback