PC ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPC ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171229
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 09 '21 at 19:23
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 245
76% 142 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 841
75% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,297
80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 308
Parallax 349
257% 324 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 270
Splatting 198
215% 274 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 215%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 869 821 830 810 818 822 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,923
Write 1,512
Mixed 1,430
SusWrite 828
318% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 80.4
282% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 963
717% 963 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 257%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 414 434 431 427 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 429
Mixed 364
SusWrite 420
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 34.8
136% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 182
140% 194 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 122%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 414 434 431 427 430 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 431
Mixed 386
SusWrite 420
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 44.1
158% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 14.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 9.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: PC ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $772
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback