TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Pegatron A15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPegatron A15  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON A15
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110722
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 09 '21 at 07:37
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 80
2-Core 125
61% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 193
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 58.8%
 Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2080) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.96%
 Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Turbox 240GB 240GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XKR905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 13 149 6.2 110 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 313
Write 6.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 89.5
22% 104 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.4
28% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 25.5%
 Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 50.2%
 Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A15 Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron A15

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel  $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples79x
Core i5-2430MIntel  $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples64x
Core i5-2410MIntel  $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples55x
GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples156x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples72x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples43x
SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples14x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples7x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples7x
RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 44%, 3,343 samples25x
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 45%, 1,309 samples23x
M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 41%, 498 samples21x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback