TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EP_X415EP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EP_X415EP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EP
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 22:50
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 167
2-Core 285
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 596
69% 538 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 80.4%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Asus(1043 159C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 18.4
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 16.7
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 15.6%
 Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1263 922 255 347 345 337 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,455
Write 1,380
Mixed 1,244
SusWrite 578
261% 1,164 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 69.6
246% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 926
689% 910 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑
This bench: 210%
 Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905711-035.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 22.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 18.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 78.5%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EP_X415EP Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EP_X415EP

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples79x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples19x
Core i3-1115G4IntelBench 51%, 18,815 samples2x
GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples70x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples29x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples1x
SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples47x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples17x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBNvmeBench 156%, 561 samples14x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples23x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples14x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback