HP Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 306B
Memory0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101221
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 18:16
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron Dual Core T3100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 7.4
2-Core 13.2
24% 27.7 Pts
4-Core 35.5
8-Core 50.5
5% 43 Pts
64-Core 49.6
3% 49.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 306B)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 153 119 135 177 114 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 174
Write 182
Mixed 141
SusWrite 142
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 11.5
40% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 78.5
59% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback