Lenovo 90G7003WMH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90G7003WMH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3100
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 13:33
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 127
46% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 236
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3100) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 15.3
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QCXB7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 209 169 169 160 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 830
Write 636
Mixed 501
SusWrite 174
119% 535 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 38.1
145% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 424
302% 390 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 213%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 129 111 148 144 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 94.3
Write 78.3
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 132
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback