Lenovo 82CY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82CY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 12:37
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 64.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 298
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 948
92% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,303
81% 1,303 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 380A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.26.03
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 34.1
21% 26.4 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 22.7
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2 1TB
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 1541 1486 1484 1471 1470 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,985
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,405
SusWrite 1,479
365% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 63.2
201% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 812
538% 655 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 258%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 28.1
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 27.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82CY Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82CY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback