Lenovo 11DQS0VY00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 11DQS0VY00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 316C
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 09:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 723
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 316C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.5
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 1
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 928 403 403 404 405 395 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,974
Write 1,948
Mixed 960
SusWrite 490
299% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 75.5
252% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 821
611% 818 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 224%
Great: 279%
TOSHIBA MK3259GSX 320GB
7GB free, PID 0571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 37 33 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 25.4
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 34.2
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 22.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11DQS0VY00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11DQS0VY00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback