Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 17:59
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 73.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 300
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,204
105% 895 Pts
64-Core 2,184
135% 2,184 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4060 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 123
Parallax 118
116% 128 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 81.4
93% 119 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 107%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1266 1253 1297 1300 1285 1298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,486
Write 1295
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 1,283
303% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 86.3
275% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,349
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 610
509% 764 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 261%
Great: 526%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
376GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 124 126 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 125
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 83%
Jmicron H/W RAID5 12TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 196 192 221 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 99.6
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 195
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
451% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 121%
Great: 126%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
911GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 38
Write 36.5
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 4.2
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 50%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 37.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 33.4
45% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.1% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 25.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 22.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback