Lenovo 81W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81W1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 11:25
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 196
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 194
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.26.11
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 5.2
3% 5.8 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 11.2
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303224
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 190 250 184 227 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 182
Write 748
Mixed 988
SusWrite 236
124% 538 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 51
157% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 215
185% 284 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81W1 Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback