MSI H81M PRO-VD (MS-7846)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7846
MotherboardMSI H81M PRO-VD (MS-7846)  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 15:17
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 153
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 240
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 7846) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 4.1
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2109XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 251 331 248 96 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66% Good
Read 431
Write 329
Mixed 267
SusWrite 214
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 26.4
97% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 65.5
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 101
87% 122 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
860GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 152 150 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 141
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 147
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M PRO-VD (MS-7846) Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H81M PRO-VD (MS-7846)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $296
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback