Gigabyte GA-EP45T-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45T-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 15:04
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 43
2-Core 84.1
44% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 167
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.1% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 63.9
56% 66.4 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 65.6
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 168 179 190 192 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59% Above average
Read 230
Write 222
Mixed 223
SusWrite 174
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 36
117% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 48.5
39% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 59%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
30GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 75 72 71 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 91.9
Write 93.9
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 74.3
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
8GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 75 72 71 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 113
Write 71.5
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 74.1
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
8GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 144 150 138 129 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 126
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 136
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2724 XG27WQ
Typical GA-EP45T-UD3P Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45T-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback